Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- report:eth [2026/03/25 13:34] – [Sales and Marketing Ethics] team4
+++ report:eth [2026/04/23 11:36] (current) – [6.2 Engineering Ethics] team4
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===== 6. Ethical and Deontological Concerns =====
 ==== 6.1 Introduction ====
-//Provide here an overview of the contents (structure) of this chapter.//
+This chapter outlines the ethical and deontological principles guiding the development of a smart artificial marine habitat. It focuses on ensuring environmental protection, data integrity, and responsible engineering practices, while addressing key considerations such as sustainability, transparency, and long-term system reliability.
 ==== 6.2 Engineering Ethics ====
-Engineering ethics play an important role in the design and development of artificial marine habitats for endangered fish species. The structures must be strong, durable, and reliable so they can withstand harsh marine conditions and continue to function effectively over a long period of time. Engineers have the responsibility to ensure that the habitats and the sensor are safe for marine life, installation workers, surrounding environments...
-It is important the habitats do not disrupt the natural ecosystems or damage the seabed. We have to avoid unintended negative impacts on the environment. The goal is that the habitat complements and enhances the existing marine habitat.
+Engineering ethics play an important role in the design and development of artificial marine habitats for endangered fish species. Engineers must ensure that structures are designed with sufficient strength, durability, and reliability to withstand harsh marine conditions such as saltwater exposure and wave forces [(QU2021)], [(FOLPP2013)]. This is essential to guarantee long-term functionality and safety.
-The engineers have to be careful about the selection of the materials. The materials must be non-toxic, environmentally responsible and long lasting. It is also important to make the production process as sustainable as possible, this way the making of the habitat is  environmentally responsible.
+Engineers also have a responsibility to ensure that both the habitat structures and monitoring systems do not pose risks to marine organisms, installation personnel, or the surrounding environment. Safety and reliability must be considered throughout the entire design process.
+Another key ethical consideration is minimizing ecological disruption. Artificial habitats should not damage the seabed or negatively affect existing ecosystems. Instead, they should be designed to support and enhance natural habitats. Studies have shown that well-designed artificial reefs can increase biodiversity and improve marine ecosystem conditions [(SELLA2015)].
+Material selection is also important. Engineers should choose non-toxic and environmentally sustainable materials that are suitable for long-term use in marine environments.
+Transparency is an essential part of ethical engineering practice. Engineers must ensure that all collected data is accurate and reported honestly, regardless of the results. This supports scientific research and contributes to better decision-making in marine conservation.
-It is very important to be transparent. This means the engineers of the habitat must be clear in the data that is collected and  share it with the scientific community to contribute to research and a better understanding of the marine ecosystems. Reporting the data truthfully, wether positive or negative, helps improve future conservation efforts.
-Ultimately, engineers have a responsibility to develop solutions that support the recovery of endangered fish species and contribute to the long-term health of marine ecosystems for future generations.
 ==== 6.3 Sales and Marketing Ethics ====
-Duty of Safety and Quality Assurance:
+__//**HERNAN: I WILL CHECK THIS**//__
+The duty of safety and quality assurance requires that all underwater sensors and electrical components are designed and implemented in a manner that ensures they are safe for both users and marine life. This includes minimizing potential risks associated with system failures by incorporating reliable design solutions and protective measures that reduce the likelihood and impact of malfunctions.
+The duty of information transparency emphasizes the importance of providing accurate and accessible data. Sensor data should be disclosed in a clear and reliable manner, allowing stakeholders to assess environmental performance and understand the actual impact of the system on sustainability outcomes.
+The duty to maximize economic utility involves supporting clients in achieving cost efficiency over time. This includes designing systems that reduce long-term maintenance requirements and operational costs, thereby increasing the overall economic value of the solution.
+==== 6.4 Environmental Ethics ====
+The project aims to support marine ecosystems while minimizing negative environmental impacts. Artificial habitats are designed to promote biodiversity and help restore fish populations without significantly disrupting the surrounding ecosystem.
+Material selection focuses on durability and environmental compatibility in order to reduce pollution and long-term ecological damage. Special attention is given to ensuring that the structures do not release harmful substances into the marine environment.
+In addition, the project contributes to environmental awareness and education by enabling the collection of monitoring data through integrated sensors. This data can support researchers and local communities in better understanding marine ecosystems and the factors that influence their health.
-- Ensuring that underwater sensors and electrical devices are harmless to both clients and aquatic life.
+The design also considers ecosystem balance by supporting species that naturally coexist and avoiding elements that could disturb the existing ecological structure. Studies have shown that ecologically enhanced marine structures can increase biodiversity without compromising structural performance [(SELLA2015)].
-- Establishing systems to minimize damages from potential malfunctions.
+==== 6.5 Liability ====
-Duty of Information Transparency:
+__//**HERNAN: I WILL CHECK IT**//__
-- Disclosing real-time sensor data to provide customers with precise metrics on actual energy reduction and their contribution to environmental sustainability.
+Liability relates to the responsibility for potential consequences if the system does not perform as intended. This includes risks such as incorrect environmental data, failure of monitoring components, or unintended interactions with the surrounding marine environment.
-Duty to Maximize Economic Utility:
+Particular attention is given to the reliability of the monitoring system, as inaccurate data could affect research outcomes and decision-making processes. Ensuring proper calibration, testing, and data validation is therefore essential.
-- Assisting clients in reducing long-term maintenance costs.
+Another aspect concerns responsibility in case of long-term system degradation. Even though the structure is intended to integrate into the environment, it is important to ensure that no harmful elements remain if components fail or deteriorate over time.
-==== Environmental Ethics ====
+Clear documentation and transparency are also part of liability, as they define how the system is used, monitored, and maintained. This helps reduce misuse and ensures that responsibility is properly understood.
-Our project aims to support marine ecosystem while minimizing negative environmental impacts. The artificial fish habitats will be designed to promote biodiversity and help restore natural fish population without disturbing the surrounding ecosystem. The project will use durable and environmentally friendly materials, such as reusable materials, granite, or concrete, to avoid pollution and reduce environmental damage. Care will also be taken to ensure that the habitats do not introduce harmful substances into the water. In addition, the project promotes environmental awareness and education about protecting marine ecosystems. Monitoring data collected from sensors can help researchers and communities better understand how marine habitats function and how they can be protected. Finally, the design will consider ecosystem balance, ensuring that the habitat supports species that naturally coexist and avoids introducing species that could negatively affect the ecosystem.
+==== 6.6 Summary ====
+This chapter has examined the ethical and deontological considerations associated with the development of a smart artificial marine habitat. Key aspects included ensuring environmental protection, maintaining data integrity, promoting transparency, and minimizing potential risks related to system deployment and operation.
-==== Liability ====
+Based on this ethical and deontological analysis, the team chose a modular habitat design combined with a separable sensor system and durable, environmentally compatible materials such as basalt fiber reinforced concrete. These choices were made to reduce long-term environmental impact, avoid pollution, and ensure that the system can be maintained without disturbing the marine ecosystem.
-==== Summary ====
+Consequently, the team decided to design a solution that prioritizes structural stability, safe integration into the seabed, and the ability to retrieve and maintain electronic components independently from the habitat structure. This approach supports responsible engineering practices and reduces potential risks related to system failure and environmental harm.
-//Provide here the conclusions of this chapter and make the bridge to the next chapter.//
-Based on this ethical and deontological analysis, the team chose <specify here the design, technique(s) material(s), component(s)> for the following <specify here the relevant ethics-related reasons>.
-Consequently, the team decided to design a solution with the following <specify here the features added for ethical reasons>.