Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- report:prm [2026/04/12 22:02] – [3.2 Time] epsatisep
+++ report:prm [2026/04/16 15:26] (current) – [Sprint Evaluations] team4
@@ Line 338: / Line 338: @@
 **Summary**
 Overall, the team made good progress in design, organization, and collaboration. However, some uncertainties and planning issues remain, and the team needs to focus on clearer decisions and more structured work moving forward.
+**Fourth week retrospective**
+**What went good**
+The presentations went good, and the components were selected.
+**What went bad**
+The communication presentation did not go that well
+**Ideas**
+No ideas
+**Actions**
+For the next week, the team need to finish the interim report, and deliver it.
+**Fifth week retrospective**
+**What went good**
+The interim report was delivered
+**What went bad**
+Should have done the report finish before the sunday.
+**Ideas**
+No ideas
+**Actions**
+For the next week, the team are prepering for the interim presentation.
+**Sixth week retrospective**
+**What went good**
+The prep for the presentation
+**What went bad**
+...
+**Ideas**
+Some of the feedback from the supervisors were to have fish in the flyer/brand. The team will look in to it.
+**Actions**
+For nexts week, the team are going to research more of the smart box, to check if there are different batteries to use and how to design it in the best way. Also to create a 3D-model video of the product.
 ==== Summary ====
 The project has been managed using an iterative and structured approach, allowing the team to balance technical challenges with continuous development. Through defined scope, milestone planning, and Agile methods, the team has made steady progress in both design and implementation. While some challenges remain, particularly related to decision-making and organization, the project is moving forward with a clearer direction and improved collaboration.